top of page

Shemale Show UPD

Ts Madison Hinton (born October 22, 1977), also known as Maddie, is an American reality television personality, actress, and LGBT activist. With the reality show The Ts Madison Experience, she became the first black trans woman to star in and executive produce her own reality series.[1] She has appeared in films such as Zola and Bros and has been a member of the regular judging panel on RuPaul's Drag Race since the show's fifteenth season following several previous appearances as a guest judge.[2]

shemale show


In 2021, The Ts Madison Experience debuted on We TV, making Madison the first black trans woman to star in her own reality show. Madison was also an executive producer on the series.[1] On February 2021, Madison shared on a Facebook panel her experiences and knowledge on erasure of Black trans love.[18] In 2022, WE tv announced that The Ts Madison Experience had been renewed for a second season.[19]

EXPLICIT: This mind-blowing, sexy story contains 7,000 words to arouse your imagination with the hottest, most graphic descriptions of shemale/transgender/futa sex, anal, oral, fisting, deep throat, facials and dirty talk.

Synthetic VAP observations are generated from TMP and DTR station anomalies (or from TMP station anomalies and gridded DTR anomalies where the station data does not include TMN and TMX), as well as the published CRU climatologies for TMP and VAP1. While the process broadly follows that described in5, synthetic anomalies are now produced at a station level, rather than as gridded data, because this better suits the interpolation process as explained above. The VAP process is shown in Fig. 3, and the impact of the inclusion of synthetic VAP on the final gridded coverage is illustrated in Supplementary File 1 (p4).

One of the benefits of a multivariate dataset is the opportunity to present, at a point in space and time, a set of variable values that are (to an extent) internally consistent. This explains much of the design of the variable production process: TMN and TMX are consistent with TMP and DTR because they are derived from them (DTR having been previously derived from TMN and TMX observations); VAP is consistent with the temperature variables inasmuch as synthetic VAP is derived from them; similarly, the synthetic parts of WET and CLD are consistent with, respectively, PRE and DTR; and FRS and PET are entirely consistent with other variables, being wholly derived from them. Figure 6 shows the consistency relationships.

Figure 8 shows the comparisons of PRE with GPCC for global- and hemispheric-mean land precipitation. The high-frequency r for Global is 0.92, though CRU TS is drier in the early Twentieth Century, perhaps due to having lower observation counts and reduced coverage. The difference is largest in the Southern Hemisphere, while the Northern Hemisphere series agree more closely (annual anomalies correlate at 0.94).

A separate suite of skill testing programs use station cross validation33 to assess the skill of the interpolation algorithm and to provide a quantitative guide to the expected accuracy of the individual interpolated values. Cross-validation could not have been performed before the move to ADW and is one of the motivations for changing to ADW. Figure 9 shows spatial maps of correlation coefficients (r) (a) and (MAE) (b) for TMP stations, with the respective distributions in (c) and (d). Figure 10 has the same format, showing DTR results, and Fig. 11 displays results for PRE. All three figures include distribution graphs for r and MAE: these should be consulted for a global overview of performance. Note that PRE anomalies are percentage differences from the mean rather than in mm units. For all three variables, the defined minimum series length for comparison was 20 months. In practice, 95% of lengths were >=236 months and 99% >=47 months for DTR, higher for TMP and PRE, with minimum lengths of 23 for TMP and PRE, 22 for DTR.

Results of cross-validation for diurnal temperature range (DTR). (a) Shows the location and correlation coefficient (r) of each station estimated from nearby interpolants; (b) as for (a), but showing the mean absolute error (MAE); (c,d) show the distributions of r and MAE respectively.

Results of cross-validation for total precipitation (PRE). (a) Shows the location and correlation coefficient (r) of each station estimated from nearby interpolants; (b) as for (a), but showing the mean absolute error (MAE); (c,d) show the distributions of r and MAE respectively.

The cross-validation for the interpolated monthly precipitation anomalies shows a broader range of outcomes, consistent with the shorted CDD for this variable, but still overwhelmingly dominated by positive cross-validation correlations (95% are >=0.38). The mode of the distribution of MAE lies just below a 30% relative error, with 95% of MAE 041b061a72

  • نبذة

    Welcome to the group! You can connect with other members, ge...

    bottom of page